Prasad v. Owen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
Bahari Prasad |
Owen Loan Servicing, LLC and Scott Anderson |
2:2015cv00555 |
March 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/11/16 RECOMMENDING that this actin be dismissed with prejudice; referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to these F&Rs within 14 days. (Benson, A) |
Filing 7 ORDER VACATING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/5/15. The Order portion of the opinion remains in full effect. Plaintiff's federal due process claim is dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint within 28 days. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 5 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/30/2015. Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. The Court is RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 1 Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. These Findings and Recommendations are SUBMITTED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 20 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.