Foss v. Rowen
Raymond C. Foss |
Todd Rowen |
2:2015cv00686 |
March 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Troy L. Nunley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/30/17 ORDERING that the parties requests for judicial notice (ECF Nos. 15 , 25 , 31 ) of matters of public record are GRANTED; and Plaintiff's request for t he appointment of counsel (ECF No. 26 ) is DENIED. It is RECOMMENDED that defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15 ) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/13/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to File Sur-reply (ECF No. 28 ) is GRANTED. Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file any sur-reply. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 26 ) is DENIED. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/02/2016 DENYING Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Reconsideration. (Butolph, J) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/05/16 denying 17 Motion for a more definite statement. Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants motion to dismiss within twenty-one days of this order. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Raymond C. Foss signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/12/2015. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to t he Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee plus the $50.00 administrative fee or a properly completed appl ication to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order; plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order or seek an extension of time to do so will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Foss v. Rowen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raymond C. Foss | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Todd Rowen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.