Stevens v. Datascan Field Services, LLC, et al
| Charlene Stevens |
| Datascan Field Services, LLC, Datascan Holdings, LLC, World Omni Financial Corp., JM Family Enterprises, Inc, Frank Armstrong, David Lodigensky, J.D. Grogan, Jerrod Yochum, Brent T. Sergot and Matt Powell |
| 2:2015cv00839 |
| April 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/15/2017 ORDERING that this case be RELATED to case number 2:17-cv-1052-KJM-AC.(Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/13/2017 GRANTING 29 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING the plaintiff's FLSA claim with prejudice; DISMISSING the plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/16/16 ORDERING that defendant's 19 Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART; plaintiff has 14 days to file an amended complaint addressing the referenced deficiency in any claim dismissed without prejudice. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/4/15 GRANTING 10 Motion to Dismiss. Amended complaint due within 10 days. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
