Borrett v. Horizon Charter Schools
Plaintiff: Norma A. Borrett
Defendant: Horizon Charter Schools
Case Number: 2:2015cv00881
Filed: April 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Placer
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/23/2024 DIRECTING the plaintiff that the court cannot provide plaintiff any guidance with respect to 44 Motion to Correct Purporting Case Record. (Woodson, A)
August 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/12/16 ORDERING that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP, this action has been DISMISSED with prejudice; CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/21/16 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for Wednesday 5/4/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Plaintiff shall file and serve status reports on or before 4/20/16, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 4/27/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/14/16 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed November 25, 2015 23 are adopted in full; Defendant's August 28, 2015 motion to dismiss 17 is granted; the amended comp laint's causes of action for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 and California state law are dismissed; and Defendant is directed to file an answer to the amended complaint's Title VII and Equal Pay Act claims within 14 days of the date of this order. (Becknal, R)
November 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/24/2015 RECOMMENDING that defendant's 17 motion to dismiss be granted. The 13 amended complaint's causes of action for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Cali fornia state law be dismissed. Defendant be directed to file an answer to the amended complaint's Title VII and Equal Pay Act claims within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motion referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
August 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/7/15 GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. The 13 Amended Complaint is deemed the operative pleading in this action. Defendant shall file a response within 20 days. (Manzer, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borrett v. Horizon Charter Schools
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norma A. Borrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Horizon Charter Schools
Represented By: Daniel P Jay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?