Parker-Liles et al v. Garcia et al
| Ciarra Parker-Liles and Marquita Figures |
| Steven Garcia and Shane Raftery |
| 2:2015cv00894 |
| April 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/27/2021 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 92 Motion in Limine No. 1. Plaintiff's expert Mr. Ernest Burwell may give expert testimony; however, that testimony must be limited to the o pinions specified. 92 Motion in Limine No. 2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff Figures is barred from presenting at trial any testimony, evidence, or argument regarding, or making any mention of: (1) former plaintiff Ciarra Parker-Liles being attacked and in jured by a police canine during the underlying incident; (2) Ms. Parker-Liles' former status as a plaintiff in this case; or (3) the settlement offered by defendants and accepted by Ms. Parker-Liles in this case. 92 Motion in Limine No.3 is G RANTED. Plaintiff is precluded from having any witness offer a medical expert opinion regarding her incident-related diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis. Plaintiff may, however, call her treating physician(s) to testify as fact witnesses. No later than 8/13/2021, plaintiff shall file a proffer of the testimony she plans to elicit from any treating physician she intends to call as a fact witness. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
90
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/25/2021 ORDERING that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiff Ciarra Parker-Liles only, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/2020 ORDERING that by 10/19/2020, the parties shall submit a joint statement outlining their agreed-upon trial schedule and associated dates (proposed pre-trial conference date, proposed deadlines for refiling any motions in limine, and the like). Based on this filing, the court will reissue its scheduling order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/20/2020 ORDERING that By 8/28/2020, the parties shall confer regarding additional settlement discussions, and whether they jointly believe a further settlement conference may be beneficial; By 9/10/2020, the parties shall file a brief joint status report. The current trial date and all associated deadlines 62 are VACATED; and Given the above, all Motions in limine 68 , 75 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject to renewal. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/2020 CONTINUING the Trial Date to 10/5/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, and the Final Pretrial Conference to 9/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Joint Pretrial Statement, Exhibit List, Witness List, Trial Briefs, Motions in Limine, Proposed Voir Dire, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Verdict Forms are due no later than 8/10/2020. Oppositions to motions in limine, Objections to proposed voir dire, and Objections to proposed jury instructions shall be filed no later than 8/24/2020. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/13/2020 ORDERING that the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 7/13/2020 at 10:00 AM and the Jury Trial is SET for 8/14/2020 at 09:00 AM, in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Jury selection will commence Monday 8/17/2020, at 9:00 a.m.. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/20 ORDERING that informal telephonic status conference is set for February 6, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. By Thursday January 30, 2020, the parties are to file a brief status report with the court addressing any concerns not addressed in the prior status reports. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 29 . Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action alleging unlawful detention; 2. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' Second Cause of Action alleging unlawful seizure; 3. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Parker-Liles's Third Cause of Action alleging ex cessive force; 4. Summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff Figures's Fourth Cause of Action alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress; 5. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Parker-Liles's and DENIED as to Plaintiff Fi gures's Fifth Cause of Action alleging violations of California Civil Code § 52.1; 6. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Parker-Liles's Sixth Cause of Action alleging assault and battery; and 7. Summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff Figures's claim for punitive damages, and GRANTED as to Plaintiff Parker-Liles's claim for the same.(Deutsch, S)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/16 GRANTING 24 Stipulated Protective Order. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
