Larson v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, et al
| Dean Larson |
| The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America and DiMAxx Technologies, LCC |
| 2:2015cv00931 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/22/16. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. The parties will bear their own respective Attorneys' fees and costs, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/5/15: Defendant DiMAxx Technologies, LCC terminated without prejudice and without costs. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/3/15. Defendants are granted an extension of time to 6/26/15 to file a responsive pleading to the complaint. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/19/15. Defendant The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America is GRANTED an extension of time to 6/26/15 to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
