Camp Richardson Resort, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Camp Richardson Resort, Inc.
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2015cv01101
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/2016 GRANTING 23 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
March 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/22/16 ORDERING the the hearing on the 23 Motion to Dismiss is RESET for 5/19/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; the briefing deadlines are extended coexistent with the continued hearing date. (Benson, A)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/1/16. (Kaminski, H)
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/9/2016 ORDERING 21 that the Proposed Order for protective order is NOT APPROVED. (Reader, L)
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/26/2016 ORDERING that defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company may have up to and including 2/17/2016 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Camp Richardson Resort, Inc.'s First Amended Complaint. (Zignago, K.)
December 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/23/2015 ORDERING the plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint by 1/13/2016. (Michel, G.)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/8/15. Plaintiff is given LEAVE TO AMEND as to all Counts. An amended complaint may be filed and served within 21 days of entry of this Order. Defendant may file a responsive pleading within 21 days of service of the amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER 7 for extension of time signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/8/2015. Defendant Philadelphia may have up to and including 7/17/2015 to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Complaint. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Camp Richardson Resort, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Camp Richardson Resort, Inc.
Represented By: James Joseph Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Represented By: James C. Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?