Magee v. Arnold

Magee v. Arnold

Petitioner:	James Edward Magee
Respondent:	Eric Arnold
Case Number:	2:2015cv02318
Filed:	November 9, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2016	Filing 10 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/2016 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be summarily dismissed; and the District Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
January 19, 2016	Filing 5 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/19/16 ordering petitioner show cause in writing why his petition should not be summarily dismissed, i.e., he is to respond to the court's tentative opinion within 30 days of the filed date of this order to show cause. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of the petition filed in this case together with a copy of this order on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Respondent may file a response within 20 days of petitioner filing his response to the tentative order; in the response, respondent shall indicate whether respondent consents to proceed before the undersigned. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General) (Plummer, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2016

Filing 10 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/2016 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be summarily dismissed; and the District Court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

January 19, 2016

Filing 5 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/19/16 ordering petitioner show cause in writing why his petition should not be summarily dismissed, i.e., he is to respond to the court's tentative opinion within 30 days of the filed date of this order to show cause. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of the petition filed in this case together with a copy of this order on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Respondent may file a response within 20 days of petitioner filing his response to the tentative order; in the response, respondent shall indicate whether respondent consents to proceed before the undersigned. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General) (Plummer, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magee v. Arnold
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Edward Magee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Arnold
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?