Day v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Day v. Commissioner of Social Security

Day v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Lisa Ann Day
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2015cv02583
Filed:	December 14, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Siskiyou
Presiding Judge:	Allison Claire
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 206
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 12, 2016	Filing 4 ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2016 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to randomly assign a district judge to this matter; ASSIGNING CASE to District Judge Troy L. Nunley; RECOMMENDING that this act ion be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the courts order pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b), E.D. Cal. R. 110; REFERRING this matter to Judge Troy L. Nunley; ORDERING that any objections be filed within twenty-one (21) days. New case number: 2:15-cv-02583-TLN AC (PS)(SS). (Michel, G.)
January 8, 2016	Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/7/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint, 1 , is DISMISSED; and Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 12, 2016

Filing 4 ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2016 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to randomly assign a district judge to this matter; ASSIGNING CASE to District Judge Troy L. Nunley; RECOMMENDING that this act ion be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the courts order pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b), E.D. Cal. R. 110; REFERRING this matter to Judge Troy L. Nunley; ORDERING that any objections be filed within twenty-one (21) days. New case number: 2:15-cv-02583-TLN AC (PS)(SS). (Michel, G.)

January 8, 2016

Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/7/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint, 1 , is DISMISSED; and Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Day v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Ann Day
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?