Aldakak v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Alaa Aldakak |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Velasquez |
| 2:2016cv00082 |
| January 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/11/16 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to a) redesignate the undersigned's findings and recommendations filed 1/25/16 as an order and b) withdraw the assignment of the District Judge in this action. For the reasons state in this court's order filed 1/25/16 this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. CASE CLOSED. (cc: MCE) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/25/16 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Alaa Aldakak and forward payment to the court until the balance is paid in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
