(SS) Woodruff v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lanorah Woodruff |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2019cv02179 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaplan, Jesse) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Talbert, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by USM. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/2/2019. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 1/31/2020 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jesse S. Kaplan* *Attorney at Law* *5441 Fair Oaks Blvd. Suite C-1* *Carmichael, CA 95608*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/29/19 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve on Plaintiff the scheduling order in social security cases; Within 15 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. (cc: USM) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (York, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Lanorah Woodruff. (Kaplan, Jesse) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Lanorah Woodruff. Attorney Kaplan, Jesse S. added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kaplan, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Woodruff v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Daniel P. Talbert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lanorah Woodruff | |
| Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
