Bradley v. Google, Inc. et al Featured Case

Plaintiff Theresa B. Bradley signed her website www.bravacorp.com up for Google AdSense. Google terminated her AdSense account 9 days later after she clicked on some third-party ads that appeared on her website. Plaintiff sued defendant Google Inc. over its failure to pay her the approximately five dollars in revenue that the ads on her site had generated.

Plaintiff: Theresa B. Bradley
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2006cv05289
Filed: August 28, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William H. Alsup
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 35
ORDER by Judge Alsup granting [32] Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2007)
February 14, 2007 Filing 34
Statement of Non-Opposition [32] Defendant's Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to Dismiss Action filed byGoogle, Inc.. (Shen, Andrew) (Filed on 2/14/2007) Modified on 2/15/2007 (sis, COURT STAFF).
February 7, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 33
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO DISMISS ACTION PURSUANT TO FRCP 41. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 7, 2007. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2007)
December 22, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 30
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER:. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 21, 2006. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2006)
December 14, 2006 Filing 25
CLERK'S NOTICE re: Documents E-Filed in a case not designated for ECF (Doc. 23) (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2006)
December 12, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 24
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 12, 2006. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2006)
December 7, 2006 Filing 23
Reply Memorandum re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed byGoogle, Inc., Google AdSense. (Shen, Andrew) (Filed on 12/7/2006)
December 4, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Alsup denying [18] Motion to Appear by Telephone (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2006)
November 30, 2006 Filing 19
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Google, Inc., Google AdSense. (Shen, Andrew) (Filed on 11/30/2006)
November 16, 2006 Filing 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Google, Inc., Google AdSense re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint, 14 Proposed Order, 13 Request for Judicial Notice, (Shen, Andrew) (Filed on 11/16/2006)
October 16, 2006 Filing 10
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint by Google, Inc., Google AdSense. (Ramani, Ashok) (Filed on 10/16/2006)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Google, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa B. Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew N Shen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?