Williams v. Malfi
| 3:2006cv05825 |
| September 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re Case Nos. 15-cv-3013, 04-cv-0117, 09-cv-3194. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 27, 2015. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 14, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING 41 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 13, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
40
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Anthony J. Malfi against Charles Lee Williams. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2009)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 26 FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 10, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Malfi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
