General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-AR18 Trust et al
| General Retirement System of the City of Detroit |
| The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-AR18 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-17 Trust, The Wells Fargo Morgage Backed Secuirites 2006-15 Trust, The Wells Fargo Morgage Backed Securities 2006-16 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-AR19 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-18 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-19 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-1 Trust, The Wells Fargo Alternative Loan 2007-PA1 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-2 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-AR3 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-4 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-3 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-5 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-7 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-8 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-9 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-10 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-11 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-12 Trust, Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., David Moskowitz, Franklin Codel, Thomas Neary, Douglas K. Johnson, Goldman, Sachs & Co., JPMorgan Chase, Inc., HSBC Securities (USA), Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., UBS Securities, LLC, CitiGroup Global Merkets, Inc., Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., Barclays Capital, Inc., Banc of America Securities, LLC, Bank of America Corporation, Moody's Investor Services, Inc., The McGraw-Hill Companies, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-20 Trust, The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2007-6 Trust and Fitch Ratings, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv01376 |
| March 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Diego |
| Susan Illston |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
210
CORRECTED ORDER RE: LAITMAN PRO HAC VICE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER continuing case management to 7/2/10 @ 2:30 p.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER continuing motions and cmc to 3/19/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2010)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER granting re 173 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/15/10. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2010)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER setting hearing on motions 1/29/10 at 9 a.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2009)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER granting substitution (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO CHANGE VENUE, APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFF, SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL, AND CONSOLIDATION. Denying 73 , 47 , denying as moot 43 , granting 52 . The New Orleans Public Funds group's motion for consolidation is Granted. These cases shall be consolidated under the lower case number C09-1376 SI, and C09-1620 shall be administratively closed. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER re: service of summons (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
