Lopez v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: Albert Lopez and Rene Pompa
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 3:2010cv01207
Filed: March 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: James Larson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVES' SERVICE PAYMENTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting in part 49 Motion for Settlement. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)
May 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION; APPROVING PROPOSED ADDITIONAL POSTCARD; AND SETTING FURTHER SCHEDULE re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 48 Order on Motion for Settlement filed by Rene Pompa, Albert Lopez. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)
September 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 45 Motion for Settlement. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2014)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES STIPULATION IN PART re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Order to Correct and Amend Preliminary Approval Order filed by Bank of America, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 25, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Hon. William H. Orrick no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/27/14. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2014)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge James Larson no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 3/16/14. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to MDL Panel. (gaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2010)
May 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING LABOR CODE SECTION 226.7 AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND re 10 Stipulation filed by Rene Pompa, Albert Lopez. Signed by Judge James Larson on 5/7/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Lopez
Represented By: Peter M. Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rene Pompa
Represented By: Peter M. Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Maria Alicia Audero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?