Ellis v. DotNext Inc. et al 
| Plaintiff: |
Maxine Ellis |
| Defendants: |
DotNext Inc., LeapFish, Inc., Behnam Behrouzi and Russell Safar |
| |
| Case Number: |
3:2010cv01599 |
| Filed: |
April 14, 2010 |
| |
| Court: |
California Northern District Court |
| Office: |
San Francisco Office |
| County: |
San Joaquin |
| Presiding Judge: |
Bernard Zimmerman |
| |
| Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause: |
42:2000 |
| Jurisdiction: |
Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
| |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| March 9, 2011 | 78 | STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011) |
| February 22, 2011 | 76 | STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/22/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2011) |
| February 9, 2011 | 73 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 65 Motion for Leave to File (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011) |
| November 12, 2010 | 63 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 58 Motion to Continue (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010) |
| September 8, 2010 | 52 | STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/7/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010) |
| July 22, 2010 | 43 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 7 Motion to Dismiss (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2010) |
| July 2, 2010 | 31 | ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman finding as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss; granting 21 Motion to Amend/Correct ; 7/19/2010 is required to E-FILE the amended document (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010) |
| June 29, 2010 | 23 | STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 6/29/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010) |
Last Document Downloaded: March 10, 2011 06:44:59 PST
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to
PACER is required.