Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan
Case Number: 3:2011cv01419
Filed: March 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 121 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DEFER DEADLINES TO IMPLEMENT SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE. All currently scheduled court hearings and conferences, as well as any outstanding associated exchange or filing deadlines, shall be vacated. The trial date of February 4, 2013 shall remain in place. The parties shall file, no later than November 16, 2012, a joint status report. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 115 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE. The Case Management Conference Statement is due November 9, 2012. The hearings on the parties' motions for summary judgment and objections to expert witnesses, and the Case Management Conference are scheduled for November 16, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
August 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. For the reasons stated, Liberty Mutual's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 9, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012)
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER VACATING AUGUST 10, 2012 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision thereon, and vacates the hearing scheduled for August 10, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012)
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER MODIFYING THE CASE SCHEDULE. Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered, with the exception that the trial date remains February 4, 2013 as scheduled, and as jointly requested by the parties in their prior stipulation. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 5, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES (DKT. NOS. 47, 50). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/14/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2012)
June 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 49 Letter requesting for telephonic appearance filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Counsel shall contact Court Call at 1-888-882-6878 to make arrangements to appear by telephone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/13/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
June 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES (DKT. NO. 47). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/5/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012)
March 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Compel (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER MODIFYING THE CASE SCHEDULE. Final dispositive motions due by 9/7/12; Fact Discovery due by 5/25/12; Expert Witness List due by 6/22/2012; Further Case Management Conference set for 10/19/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7, 19th Floor, San Francisco ; Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/11/12 03:00 PM in Courtroom 7, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection/ Jury Trial set for 2/4/13 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Defendant and counter-claimant California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan's Motion to Compel, filed December 30, 2011, and all further discovery matter s, are referred to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge's calendar. The February 3, 2012 hearing is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 9, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 2, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Raoul Dion Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?