Chancellor v. OneWest Bank et al
Andrea Chancellor |
OneWest Bank and Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation |
4:2012cv01068 |
March 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Laurel Beeler |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 27 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The 9/6/2012 hearing is VACATED. All of Ms. Chancellor's claims either survive or have been dismissed with prejudice. To avoid confusion and to clarify the record, Ms. Chancellor is directed to file, within 14 days from the date of this order, a Third Amended Complaint that includes only her surviving causes of action. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), OneWest shall answer Ms. Chancellor's Third Amended Complaint within 14 days of being served with it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/4/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012) |
Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 12 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/22/2012.(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012) |
Filing 14 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler denying 4 Motion to Dismiss as moot.(lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.