Osmena et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC et al
Plaintiff: David T Osmena and Patricia Hogan-Osmena
Defendant: Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC and 1-100, inclusive Does
Case Number: 5:2012cv02937
Filed: June 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER EXPUNGING re 98 Order to Show Cause and August 16, 2013 hearing date is vacated. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/12/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/16/2013 at 09:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/12/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Stipulated Protective Order) filed by Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on January 22, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)
January 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas re Confidential Protective Order; terminating 71 Discovery Letter Brief; terminating 74 Discovery Letter Brief (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER re 71 Discovery Letter Brief Regarding Entry of a Confidentiality Protective Order filed by David T Osmena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on December 20, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND VACATING MOTION HEARING by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osmena et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David T Osmena
Represented By: Justin Potter Karczag
Represented By: Robert A. Curtis
Represented By: Peter J. Bezek
Represented By: Andrew P Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Hogan-Osmena
Represented By: Peter J. Bezek
Represented By: Robert A. Curtis
Represented By: Justin Potter Karczag
Represented By: Andrew P Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
Represented By: Mark C. Dosker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1-100, inclusive Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?