Cepheid v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al
Cepheid |
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. |
3:2012cv04411 |
August 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Santa Clara |
Edward M. Chen |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 108 Stipulation filed by Cepheid. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/14/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018) |
Filing 107 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 106 Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference; Proposed Order filed by Cepheid. Case Management Statement due by 9/20/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/1/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2018) |
Filing 105 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Cepheid. Case Management Statement due by 5/31/2018. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 6/7/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/28/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2018) |
Filing 100 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 99 Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference:Proposed Order filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/13/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2017) |
Filing 97 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 96 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 6/8/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 6/15/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/3/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016) |
Filing 93 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 92 Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference; Proposed Order filed by Cepheid. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016) |
Filing 90 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 89 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference; Proposed Order filed by Cepheid Case Management Statement due by 4/14/2016. Case Management Conference set for 4/21/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/16/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2015) |
Filing 87 STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2015. Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/13/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015) |
Filing 82 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 81 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Request to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Cepheid Case Management Statement due by 11/6/2014. Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/26/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014) |
Filing 75 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTEND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 10/3/2013. Case Management Conference set for 10/10/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/7/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2013) |
Filing 73 STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting CMC 72 Notice (Other) filed by Cepheid Case Management Statement due by 6/13/2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/20/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/11/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013) |
Filing 68 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 50 Defendant's Motion to Stay and Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2013) |
Filing 57 ORDER re 56 Notice to bring equipment to court, filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/19/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012) Modified on 12/19/2012 (bpf, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 48 AMENDED ORDER re 47 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,,. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on December 13, 2012. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 RE: SECOND FURTHER EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 FURTHER EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 RE: EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -- CORRECTION OF DOCKET #, terminated 7 filed by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.