Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC |
Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Wildcat Creek, Inc. |
3:2012cv04753 |
September 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Laurel Beeler |
Charles R. Breyer |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER granting 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Reset Deadlines as to 44 MOTION to Dismiss Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC's First Amended Complaint</i. Responses due by 7/9/2013. Replies due by 7/26/2013. Motion Hearing set for 8/9/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/23/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2013) |
Filing 35 ORDER re 34 Stipulation filed by Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/7/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2013) |
Filing 14 ORDER regarding 5 Plaintiff's ex parte motion for expedited discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/5/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2012) |
Filing 8 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/20/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.