Rodriguez v. Staples the office superstore, LLC
| Steven Rodriguez |
| Staples the office superstore, LLC |
| 3:2013cv01076 |
| March 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/30/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Stipulated Protective Order) filed by Staples the office superstore, LLC, PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/22/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY PHONE re 19 Proposed Order filed by Steven Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Staples the office superstore, LLC and Steven Rodriguez filed by Staples the office superstore, LLC, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/26/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
14
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/4/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
