Mizuho Orthodpedic Systems Inc v. Maquet Cardiovascular, L.L.C.
Mizuho Orthodpedic Systems Inc |
Maquet Cardiovascular, L.L.C., Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Maquet, Inc. |
3:2013cv01587 |
April 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Joseph C. Spero |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 12, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2014) |
Filing 38 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2; ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 7, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014) |
Filing 28 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 19, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2013) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING 25 SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AND RESETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Defendants will respond to plaintiff's complaint no later than September 9, 2013. The September 20, 2013 case management conference is continued to October 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 8, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.