Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. v. OSD Audio et al
Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. |
Sears Holding Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., OSD Audio, Freeshipmounts.com and Hayden Ly |
3:2013cv01881 |
April 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Outside US |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/5/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014) |
Filing 52 CORRECTED ADDENDUM TO SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014) |
Filing 39 ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS re 36 Response to Order to Show Cause, filed by Highgrade Tech. Co., Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013) |
Filing 35 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Show Cause Response due by 9/27/2013. Initial Case Management Conference CONTINUED to 10/9/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 17, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING CHANG & COTE, LLP'S WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT OSD AUDIO. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 12, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.