The Clorox Company et al v. Mavea LLC
| The Brita Products Company, Brita LP, The Clorox Company and The Clorox Sales Company |
| Mavea LLC |
| 3:2013cv01933 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 57 Stipulated Dismissal.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL re 51 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, filed by The Clorox Company, The Clorox Sales Company, Brita LP, The Brita Products Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/6/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT AT PARAGRAPH 6.3]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/27/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2014)
|
|
Filing
45
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/18/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 10 11 Motion to Dismiss (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Hon. Richard Seeborg no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/18/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
