Adel v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al
Darian Adel |
Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Lonnie M. Smith, Gary S. Guthart, Salvatore J. Brogna, Agusto V. Castello, Jerome J. McNamara, Mark J. Meltzer, Marshall L. Mohr, Colin Morales and David J. Rosa |
3:2013cv02365 |
May 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Los Angeles |
Samuel Conti |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Darian Adel. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/20/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The parties are ordered to appear on 8/23/2013 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause why the court should not impose any and all appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal for failure to prosecute, on the parties, or any of them, for failure to file a Joint Case Management Statement. On or before 8/16/2013, the parties shall file, either jointly or separately, a statement demonstrating good cause for their failure to comply as directed. The Case Management Conference scheduled for 8/16/2013, is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/14/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.