Vasquez v. Bank of America , N.A.
| Tina M. Vasquez |
| Bank of America , N.A. |
| 3:2013cv02902 |
| June 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS filed by Tina M. Vasquez. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 6, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Jon S. Tigar, granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Dismiss. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 37 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2014)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar, granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Bank of America, N.A. Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting ADR Process filed by Bank of America, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 23, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE NOTICE ADDRESSING DIVERSITY JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 26, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 15 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Hearing on Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursurant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6), filed by Bank of America, N.A. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 10, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vasquez v. Bank of America , N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America , N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Vincent Quattrocchi, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tina M. Vasquez | |
| Represented By: | Matthew David Mellen |
| Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Adelaars |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
