David Hajime Brown-v-Mandarich Law Group, LLP., et al.
Plaintiff: David Hajime Brown
Defendant: Mandarich Law Group, LLP and CACH, LLC
Case Number: 4:2013cv04703
Filed: October 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 62 MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5) & (6) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2015)
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 66 Substitution of Counsel filed by Mandarich Law Group, CACH, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 2/13/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2015)
February 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER RE: HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B)(5) & (6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 2/11/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 49 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 50 Motion for Leave to File; denying 51 Motion for Leave to File (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'S MOTION TO OFFSET JUDGMENT IN PART by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part 40 Motion to Alter Judgment. The Court GRANTS CACH's motion IN PART. Plaintiff's judgment in this action against CACH is reduced by $2,000.00, such that Plaintiff's total judgment against CACH is now $8,002.86, the amount awarded in attorney's fees. This order does not affect Plaintiff's judgment against Mandarich Law Group.(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Order by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. (jsclc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Hajime Brown-v-Mandarich Law Group, LLP., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Hajime Brown
Represented By: Raeon Rodrigo Roulston
Represented By: Fred W. Schwinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mandarich Law Group, LLP
Represented By: Jo-Anna M Nieves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CACH, LLC
Represented By: Jo-Anna M Nieves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?