Newlife Sciences LLC et al v. Landmark American Insurance Company
Plaintiff: John Crosson, Newlife Sciences LLC and C. Read McLean
Defendant: Landmark American Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv05145
Filed: November 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/13/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2014)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(b). Motion Hearing set for 7/10/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/7/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2014)
April 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motion Hearing set for 5/22/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/22/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)
December 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/10/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newlife Sciences LLC et al v. Landmark American Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Crosson
Represented By: Daniel Jeffrey Spielfogel
Represented By: Andre Hassid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Newlife Sciences LLC
Represented By: Daniel Jeffrey Spielfogel
Represented By: Andre Hassid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C. Read McLean
Represented By: Andre Hassid
Represented By: Daniel Jeffrey Spielfogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark American Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?