Smith v. Pegatron USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Smith
Defendant: Pegatron USA, Inc., ASRock America, Inc. and Fatality, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv01822
Filed: April 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER OF DISMISSAL (30 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/20/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 68 STIPULATION [JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT] filed by Joshua Smith. Second Amended Complaint due by 4/17/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/13/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2015)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER, granting 62 STIPULATION to Reschedule Case Management Conference filed by Joshua Smith. Case Management Statement due by 3/13/2015. Further Case Management Conference reset for 3/20/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/17/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 32 MOTION for Administrative Relief to Continue the July 25, 2014 Case Management Conference and Related Dates filed by Fatality, Inc., Pegatron USA, Inc., ASRock America, Inc.. Case Management Statement due by 10/17/2014. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 10/24/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/1/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Pegatron USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Smith
Represented By: Rafey S. Balabanian
Represented By: Jay Edelson
Represented By: Mark Stephen Eisen
Represented By: Amir Cheyenne Missaghi
Represented By: Benjamin Scott Thomassen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pegatron USA, Inc.
Represented By: Tod Lawrence Gamlen
Represented By: Mark D. Taylor
Represented By: Christina Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASRock America, Inc.
Represented By: Tod Lawrence Gamlen
Represented By: Mark D. Taylor
Represented By: Christina Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fatality, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?