Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Software Tech
| Adobe Systems Incorporated |
| Software Tech |
| 3:2014cv02140 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER re Plaintiff's Request for Attorney's Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/24/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
99
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 64 Motion for Sanctions. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015).
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd re 94 Discovery Dispute Joint Report No. 1. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE 9/18/2015 EVIDENTIARY HEARING re 64 MOTION for Sanctions and Contempt. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/16/2015. The hearing will proceed as scheduled on September 18, 2015 at 1:30 pm. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER re 64 SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS. HEARING SET FOR SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 AT 1:30P.M. filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on August 19, 2015. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2015)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE RE 60 . Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on June 24, 2015. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER REQUIRING PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION (Laurel Beeler) (Filed on 6/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/11/2015. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2015)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER 51 Entering First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/3/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2015)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Re CMC 22 ; entering 23 . Further CMC set for October 31, 2014 at 10:30am. Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on 8/14/2014. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER 17 Selecting ADR Process. Case Referred to Mediation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/7/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2014)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/9/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Software Tech | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Marcus Freeman Chaney |
| Represented By: | Christopher Dain Johnson |
| Represented By: | Christopher Quang Pham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Software Tech | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
