Emerson v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
| Annita Emerson |
| Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv02842 |
| June 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting 21 Motion to Transfer Case. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 21 MOTION to Transfer Case To The Central District Of California filed by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Schedule for Motion to Transfer and Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Motion due by 9/12/2014. Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 11/13/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
