Electronic Frontier Foundation v. National Security Agency et al
Plaintiff: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Defendant: National Security Agency and Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Case Number: 3:2014cv03010
Filed: July 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER 48 TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO REPORT TO THE COURT WHETHER THEY HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT ON THE ISSUE OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/6/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2016)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 46 TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO REPORT TO THE COURT WHETHER THEY HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT ON THE ISSUE OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/10/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2016)
March 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BY FOUR BUSINESS DAYS DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND THEIR OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/7/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER on stipulated request to set a briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/29/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2015)
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Request for Continuance of Summary Judgment Briefing to Permit Reprocessing of Document and Proposed Order. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/11/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2015)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/19/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Electronic Frontier Foundation v. National Security Agency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Security Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Represented By: Nathan Daniel Cardozo
Represented By: Andrew Gellis Crocker
Represented By: Mark Thomas Rumold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?