Flaishans v. Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc.
Thomas Flaishans |
Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc. |
3:2014cv03249 |
July 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER. (1) Plaintiff dismisses all claims and all causes of action as to all defendants, brought individually on his own behalf, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (2) Plaintiff dismisses all claims and all causes of action as to all defendants, brought on behalf of others, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (3) Plaintiff and defendant agree to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 16, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016) |
Filing 41 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 4, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2016) |
Filing 38 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On January 29, 2016, counsel for plaintiff failed to appear as ordered at a regularly scheduled case management conference in the above-titled action. Accordingly, said counsel is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later than February 12, 2016, why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the Court's order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 1/29/16. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2016) |
Filing 37 STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE; ORDER. The Case Management Conference currently set for January 8, 2016, is continued to January 29, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 4, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016) |
Filing 34 ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. The Status Conference currently set for February 5, 2016, is advanced to January 8, 2016. A Joint Status Conference Statement shall be filed by the parties no later than December 31, 2015, in which the parties shall address, inter alia: (1) The sum plaintiff could reasonably anticipate being awarded on his PAGA claims on behalf of himself and the aggrieved employees, if liability had been found on at least one of plaintiff' s other claims under the California Labor Code; (2) The amount for which plaintiff's other claims were settled; (3) The strength of any defenses to plaintiff's claims; and (4) Any authority on which the parties rely to support the PAGA settlement amount. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 9, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015) |
Filing 31 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 1/12/15. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015) |
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATED SELECTION OF PRIVATE MEDIATION AS ADR PROCESS Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 18, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2014) |
Filing 23 ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff may file the Second Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A to the parties' stipulation. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 27, 2014. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2014) |
Filing 20 SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Plaintiff is ordered to submit a chambers copy of his amended complaint by Tuesday, October 14, 2014, otherwise said document shall be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 10, 2014. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2014) |
Filing 19 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Plaintiff is ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of his Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 29, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than October 15, 2014. The Case Management Conference is continued from October 17, 2014 to January 9, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 23, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014) |
Filing 16 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING. In light of a scheduling conflict, the hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is continued to October 3, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 25, 2014. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flaishans v. Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas Flaishans | |
Represented By: | William Lucas Marder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael E. Brewer |
Represented By: | Alexa L Woerner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.