Villacis v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
| Maria Villacis |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Sage Point Lender Services, LLC |
| 3:2014cv03279 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 48 Motion to Substitute Counsel. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/15/2015. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2015)
|
|
Filing
47
Order by Hon. James Donato granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss. If an amended complaint is not filed by May 27, 2015, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
41
Order referring case to ADR unit for assessment telephone conference. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/29/2014. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 First Amended Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/15/2014. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2014)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, signed 8/4/14, re 7 Stipulation To Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/4/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
