Castillo-Antonio v. Barron et al
Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio |
Cuauhtemoc Barron, Mohammed Vahdatpour and Christine Vahdatpour |
3:2014cv03320 |
July 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Laurel Beeler |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/29/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/10/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 18 Motion to Amend/Correct. The court grants the plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 18) to amend his complaint to add Bahman Emam as a defendant. The court orders the plaintiff to serve the new defendant, Ba hman Emam, and the defaulted defendant, Ali Harbi. The plaintiff need not serve the defaulted defendant, Cuauhtemoc Barron. The court directs the clerk to file the Second Amended Complaint that is attached (ECF No. 18-3) to the plaintiff's motion. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 11 Motion to Amend Complaint to add defendant Ali Harbi. Plaintiff must re-serve all defendants, including Cuauhtemoc Barron. The court directs the clerk to file ECF No. 11-3 as the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. The court vacates the hearing that is now set for January 15 2015. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.