Kathy Plusch Anderson v. Amdocs, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kathy Anderson
Defendant: Amdocs, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv03483
Filed: August 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Placer
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/14/15. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014) Modified on 10/15/2014 (ysS, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kathy Plusch Anderson v. Amdocs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy Anderson
Represented By: Thomas Walker Falvey
Represented By: V. James DeSimone
Represented By: Michael Hagop Boyamian
Represented By: Lawrance A. Bohm
Represented By: Michael David Seplow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amdocs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?