California Strawberry Commission v. Regents of the University of California, The
| California Strawberry Commission |
| Regents of the University of California, The |
| 3:2014cv04801 |
| October 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Cruz |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 32 Order; 33 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Regents of the University of California, The, 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY COMMISSION'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by California Strawberry Commission. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 17, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY COMMISSION'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by California Strawberry Commission. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 12, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference filed by California Strawberry Commission. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 12, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
