T. R. v. Humboldt County Office of Education et al
| T. R. |
| Humboldt County Office of Education, Humboldt County Board of Education, Garry Eagles and Mindy Fattig |
| 3:2014cv04839 |
| October 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Eureka Office |
| Humboldt |
| Nandor J. Vadas |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 28 Motion to Dismiss and 36 Motion to Strike by Judge Nandor J. Vadas. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER taking pending motion under submission. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/12/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for April 28, 2015 is VACATED; County Defendants shall have until on or before April 28, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond to Amended Complaint; and hearing on the Motion to Dismiss RESET for May 26, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 3/31/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/28/2015 01:00 PM. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 2/25/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2015)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for 3/17/2015 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 1/8/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
