Turkalj v. Entra Default Solutions, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Matija Turkalj
Defendant: Entra Default Solutions, LLC and BSI Financial Services, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv04945
Filed: November 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Turkalj is granted leave to amend. If he chooses to do so, he should set forth specific non-conclusory facts and allege viable legal theories in an organized and intelligible fashion showing an entitlement to relief. Any amended complaint must be filed within 20 days of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 19 STIPULATION. Motion Hearing as to 10 MOTION to Dismiss set for 4/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco be fore Hon. William H. Orrick. If the parties believe that the motion to dismiss should remain vacated for the time being, they may appear at the previously-scheduled March 24, 2015 case management conference and state their reasons. Otherwise, the Case Management Conference is continued to 6/2/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco (Case Management Statement due by 5/26/2015). Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/18/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2015)
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE - Plaintiff, plaintiff's counsel, and defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as possible but no later than March 2, 2015. The February 18, 2015 hearing on defendants' 10 MOTION to Dismiss is VACATED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/21/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2015)
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/9/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turkalj v. Entra Default Solutions, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Entra Default Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BSI Financial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matija Turkalj
Represented By: Charles Thomas Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?