Windsor Securities, LLC v. Jane Ann Stamatov Family Insurance Trust et al
Windsor Securities, LLC |
Jane Ann Stamatov Family Insurance Trust and Larry L. Davidson |
3:2015cv00080 |
January 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jon S. Tigar |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/14/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016) |
Filing 29 SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES (re 3:14-cv-04651-WHO John Hancock Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Goss et al). Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 7, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2015) |
Filing 26 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/7/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 9, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2015) |
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Answer due 4/22/2015. Case Management Statement due by 4/29/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/13/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 15, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.