Wu v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: Jian Ling Wu
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service and Jessica Radd
Case Number: 3:2015cv00161
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 25 Stipulation Amended filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, Jian Ling Wu, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 8/19/15. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2015)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Dismissal Without Prejudice of Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, Jessica Radd filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, Jian Ling Wu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/31/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015)
March 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Secret Service filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, Jian Ling Wu, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/26/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wu v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Secret Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jessica Radd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jian Ling Wu
Represented By: Michael Hyungchoon Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?