NewPark Mall LLC v. CRGE Newpark Mall, LLC et al
Plaintiff: NewPark Mall LLC
Defendant: CRGE Newpark Mall, LLC and Boomtown Entertainment, LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00817
Filed: February 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Strike Answer and Motion for Default Judgment (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
November 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 Discovery Order re 42 Letter and 37 Motion to Compel Production of Documents filed by Plaintiff NewPark Mall LLC. Defendants are ORDERED to produce all responsive documents, without objections, by November 12, 2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/5/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2015)
October 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Discovery Order re 42 Letter filed by NewPark Mall LLC. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/29/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2015)
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/21/2015. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)
July 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 34 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/7/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2015)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/25/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/2/2015 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/24/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)
May 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING 14 MOTION to Set Aside Default. Defendants shall file an Answer or other responsive pleading by 6/4/2015. If Defendants fail to respond, Plaintiff shall file its Opposition to Defendants' Motion by 6/11/2015, Defendants shall file their Reply by 6/18/2015, and the Court shall conduct a hearing on 7/2/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/28/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER re 14 MOTION to Set Aside Default. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/30/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NewPark Mall LLC v. CRGE Newpark Mall, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NewPark Mall LLC
Represented By: Kurt A. Kappes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRGE Newpark Mall, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boomtown Entertainment, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?