Wood v. Radware, Inc. et al
Sabrina Wood |
Radware, Inc. and James Colby |
3:2015cv01178 |
March 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Mateo |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE re 40 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Radware, Inc., Sabrina Wood, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/22/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016) |
Filing 39 ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance hearing is set for Friday, 4/22/2016 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/29/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016) |
Filing 31 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S STANDING ORDER IN CIVIL CASE. Order to Show Cause Hearing as well as a Pre-filing Conference on the Summary Judgment Motion is set for Tuesday, 3/22/2016 02:00 PM. Show Cause Response and Response to pre-filing letter due by WEDNESDAY, 3/16/2016. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/14/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/9/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.