PuraPharm International (H.K.) Limited v. PurePharma, Inc. et al
| PuraPharm International (H.K.) Limited |
| PurePharma, Inc. and PurePharma APS |
| 3:2015cv01808 |
| April 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/4/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/11/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/30/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
48
AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/27/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
47
PRETRIAL ORDER. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/29/2015. Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/24/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting 12 Motion to Transfer Venue to Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (marflores, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
