Fowler et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
David Fowler and Colisa McFadden |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
4:2018cv01254 |
February 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 17, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2019) |
Filing 63 ORDER GRANTING DEFERRED PORTION OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT; SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs' motion to set aside the judgment is granted, and plaintiffs are afforded leave to file, no later than April 19, 2019, a Revised First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 26, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2019) |
Filing 60 ORDER DENYING IN PART AND DEFERRING RULING IN PART ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order vacating the judgment and order of dismissal as to the First Cause of Action, th e motion is denied. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order vacating the judgment and order of dismissal for the purpose of allowing plaintiffs to file an amended complaint, the Court defers ruling. Plaintiffs may file, no later than February 8, 2019 , a proposed amended complaint, along with a supplemental brief, not to exceed five pages in length, in support of their request to amend. Wells Fargo shall file, no later than February 22, 2019, any response thereto, not to exceed five pages in length. As of February 22, 2019, unless the parties are otherwise advised, the deferred portion of plaintiffs' motion will be deemed submitted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 18, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019) |
Filing 54 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; VACATING TEMPRARY RESTRAINING ORDER; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 14, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
Filing 48 ORDER AFFORDING PARTIES LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 12, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2018) Modified on 10/12/2018 (mmclc1, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING. Wells Fargo is ordered to show cause, on March 1 6, 2018, why an order should not be entered granting plaintiffs a preliminary injunction enjoining Wells Fargo and its agents from foreclosing upon and selling the property. With respect thereto, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: Wells Fargo shall file, no later than 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 7, 2018, any opposition to plaintiffs' application, and plaintiffs shall file, no later than 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 13, 2018, any reply thereto. Pending the March 16, 2018, hearing, Wells Fargo and its agents are temporarily restrained from foreclosing upon and selling the above-referenced property. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 27, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.