Robbins v. PlushCare, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sarah Robbins
Defendant: PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C. and PlushCare, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv03444
Filed: May 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION; AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Defendants shall have until July 26, 2021, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. If Defendants file a motion in response to the Complaint, the opposition shall be filed no later than August 23, 2021, the reply shall be filed no later than September 7, 2021, and the hearing date shall be September 24, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. The Case Management Conference is continued from August 6, 2021, to November 5, 2021, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2021. (mmclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2021)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines as to #17 Order on Stipulation,,., Set/Reset Deadlines:, Set/Reset Hearing re #17 Order on Stipulation,, Motion to Dismiss due by 7/26/2021. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 9/24/2021 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/29/2021. Initial Case Management Conference reset to 11/5/2021 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2021)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C., PlushCare, Inc. (Culp, Kimberly) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Complaint; Briefing Schedule for Motion; and Request to Continue Case Management Conference filed by PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C., PlushCare, Inc.. (Culp, Kimberly) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sarah Robbins re #10 Case Management Scheduling Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 6/29/2021)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sarah Robbins re #10 Case Management Scheduling Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 6/29/2021)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Robbins. PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C. served on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 6/29/2021)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Robbins. PlushCare, Inc. served on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 6/29/2021)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/6/2021 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, - Telephonic Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/30/2021. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 5/24/21. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 05/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2021)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sarah Robbins.. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 5/21/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C., and PlushCare, Inc.. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/29/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/5/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2021)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/21/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2021)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sarah Robbins (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 5/7/2021)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 5/7/2021)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C., PlushCare, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15942017.). Filed bySarah Robbins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marron, Ronald) (Filed on 5/7/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robbins v. PlushCare, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Robbins
Represented By: Ronald A. Marron
Represented By: Alexis M Wood
Represented By: Kas L Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PlushCare of California, Inc. A.P.C.
Represented By: Kimberly Irene Culp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PlushCare, Inc.
Represented By: Kimberly Irene Culp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?