C. et al v. California Physicians Service
Plaintiff: C. C. and J. C.
Defendant: California Physicians Service doing business as Blue Shield of California
Case Number: 3:2021cv05832
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Order by Judge James Donato granting #30 Stipulation. Defendant Blue Shield's response to the complaint is due by September 27, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2021)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #2 Complaint to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by California Physicians Service. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Cohen, Nathaniel) (Filed on 8/26/2021)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 11/12/2021.. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/11/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2021) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2021: #1 Corrected CMC Order) (lrcS, COURT STAFF).
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 8/10/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by California Physicians Service.. (Laska, Joseph) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathaniel Adams Cohen Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Defendant California Physicians' Service dba Blue Shield of California (Cohen, Nathaniel) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Neil Pimstone Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Defendant California Physicians' Service dba Blue Shield of California (Pimstone, Gregory) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 8/17/2021. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/22/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/29/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2021)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Case transferred in from District of Utah; Case Number 4:21-cv-00010. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting #9 Motion to Change Venue to USDC Northern Dist of CA. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 7/29/21 (alt)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE OF FILING of [Proposed] Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens re #9 MOTION to Change Venue Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. (Laska, Joseph)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 DOCKET TEXT ORDER taking under advisement #9 Motion to Transfer Venue. By no later than July 28, 2021, Defendant must prepare and file a proposed memorandum decision and order granting the #9 Motion in compliance with DUCivR 54-1(b). Counsel are directed to the instructions about Proposed Orders and the order template at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/judge-nuffer-chambers. A copy of each proposed order, in WORD format, must be emailed to dj.nuffer@utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on July 13, 2021. No attached document. (bde)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Change Venue Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. (Mayer, John)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Change Venue Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens filed by Plaintiffs C. C., J. C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C.C. Declaration)(King, Brian)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #12 Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the #2 Complaint is extended to 30 days after the date of the order on Defendant's #9 Motion to Transfer Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on April 29, 2021. No attached document. (bde)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Ji Won Kim for California Physicians Service.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. So ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 4/27/21 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Joseph E. Laska for California Physicians Service.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. So ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 4/27/21 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Mayer, John)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant California Physicians Service identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Mayer, John)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Request for Judicial Notice by California Physicians Service re #9 MOTION to Change Venue Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Mayer, John)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Change Venue Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue under the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Mayer, John)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ji Won Kim , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3988111,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. (Mayer, John)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Joseph E. Laska , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3988083,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant California Physicians Service. Attorney John V. Mayer added to party California Physicians Service(pty:dft)(Mayer, John)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by J. C., C. C. as to California Physicians Service Waiver sent on 2/25/2021, answer due 4/26/2021. (King, Brian)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/26/2021. (pjd)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 1/25/21
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against California Physicians Service (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3888557) filed by J. C., C. C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (King, Brian)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiffs C. C., J. C. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C. et al v. California Physicians Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C. C.
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. C.
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Physicians Service doing business as Blue Shield of California
Represented By: Ji Won Kim
Represented By: Joseph E. Laska
Represented By: John V. Mayer
Represented By: Gregory Neil Pimstone
Represented By: Joseph Edward Laska
Represented By: Nathaniel Adams Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?