Tolbert v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Kim E. Tolbert |
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Department of Public Health and Barbara Garcia |
3:2022cv01467 |
March 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Susan Illston |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: REQUEST TO RELATE (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 Sua Sponte Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 16-cv-000810-JD. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/4/2022. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 03/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kim E. Tolbert.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2022) |
Filing 3 NOTICE AND ORDER: The attached notice and order notifies the plaintiff of resources available, attaches the district's handbook for litigants who do not have a lawyer, includes a flyer for contacting the court's help desk and instructs the plaintiff about serving the defendants. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 03/09/2022. (Attachments: #1 Self Help Flyer, #2 Pro Se Handbook)(ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2022) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Racial Discrimination; Demand for Jury Trial against City and County of San Francisco, Barbara Garcia, San Francisco Department of Public Health (Filing fee $ 402.00., receipt number 34611158646). Filed by Kim E. Tolbert. Consent/Declination due by 3/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing fee receipt, #3 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.