Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. et al
Athletics Investment Group, LLC |
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. and Bay Area Air Quality Management District |
3:2022cv03268 |
June 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Maxine M Chesney |
Environmental Matters |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Respondent's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) For Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief byBay Area Air Quality Management District. (Hogin, Bradley) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
Filing 16 Real Party in Interest's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) For Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief bySchnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.. (VanBuskirk, Ronald) (Filed on 7/11/2022) |
Filing 15 ORDER RELATING CASES. Athletics Investment Group LLC v Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-5246 MMC, is related to Athletics Investment Group LLC v Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Case No. 22-cv-3268 MMC. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 29, 2022. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2022) |
Filing 14 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Athletics Investment Group, LLC. (Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2022 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/2/2022.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 6/9/2022. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2022) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time for the Respondents and Real Party In Interest to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief filed by Bay Area Air Quality Management District. (Hogin, Bradley) (Filed on 6/8/2022) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SUBMIT COURTESY COPIES OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND EXHIBITS ATTACHED THERETO. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 7, 2022. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 06/07/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2022 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc... (VanBuskirk, Ronald) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. and Corporate Disclosure Statement (VanBuskirk, Ronald) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. and Certificate of Interested Entities (VanBuskirk, Ronald) (Filed on 6/7/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/20/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2022) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Bay Area Air Quality Management District Corrected. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet (I)(c) Plaintiff's Attorney Information)(Hogin, Bradley) (Filed on 6/6/2022) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Bay Area Air Quality Management District re #1 Notice of Removal, (Hogin, Bradley) (Filed on 6/3/2022) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda Superior. Their case number is 22CV010930. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17236548). Filed byBay Area Air Quality Management District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-J, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment to Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Hogin, Bradley) (Filed on 6/3/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.